<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dowell Myers on Proposition 13, Demographics and Housing: The New Reality After the Crash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://planning-research.com/proposition-13-demographics-and-housing-the-new-reality-after-the-crash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://planning-research.com/proposition-13-demographics-and-housing-the-new-reality-after-the-crash/</link>
	<description>essays on urban studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:20:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: quick hits &#171; west north</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/proposition-13-demographics-and-housing-the-new-reality-after-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-12696</link>
		<dc:creator>quick hits &#171; west north</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.com/?p=416#comment-12696</guid>
		<description>[...] Proposition 13 really is a tax on newcomers and the young, according to research by Dowell Myers. Senior homeowners get an average of $1,000 a year, paid for by homeowners under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Proposition 13 really is a tax on newcomers and the young, according to research by Dowell Myers. Senior homeowners get an average of $1,000 a year, paid for by homeowners under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Curry</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/proposition-13-demographics-and-housing-the-new-reality-after-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-12091</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Curry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.com/?p=416#comment-12091</guid>
		<description>The missing information on commercial properties is a large part of the story of Prop 13. How many businesses remain in possession of their pre-Prop 13 properties, compared to homeowners? What is the difference in scale in terms of business tax savings (or should we call it state tax losses) vs. homeowner tax savings? The fact that commercial properties were included at all in Prop 13 may have as much to do with the passage of the &quot;tax revolt&quot; than Jarvis&#039; emotional appeal to homeowners. At the very least it helped fund the campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The missing information on commercial properties is a large part of the story of Prop 13. How many businesses remain in possession of their pre-Prop 13 properties, compared to homeowners? What is the difference in scale in terms of business tax savings (or should we call it state tax losses) vs. homeowner tax savings? The fact that commercial properties were included at all in Prop 13 may have as much to do with the passage of the &#8220;tax revolt&#8221; than Jarvis&#8217; emotional appeal to homeowners. At the very least it helped fund the campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ormond Otvos</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/proposition-13-demographics-and-housing-the-new-reality-after-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-11964</link>
		<dc:creator>Ormond Otvos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.com/?p=416#comment-11964</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t notice any analysis of young vs old earning capacity, effects on pensions, stability of neighborhoods on family expansion with near relatives taking over family homes, etc.

Seems a narrow analysis for that reason, and as a narrow analysis, suspect. Booms seem to be expected as a moral wash. They aren&#039;t.

You&#039;re right, using home values, and businesses as people has the usual personhood flaws. Business trumps good government. What&#039;s new?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t notice any analysis of young vs old earning capacity, effects on pensions, stability of neighborhoods on family expansion with near relatives taking over family homes, etc.</p>
<p>Seems a narrow analysis for that reason, and as a narrow analysis, suspect. Booms seem to be expected as a moral wash. They aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, using home values, and businesses as people has the usual personhood flaws. Business trumps good government. What&#8217;s new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dowell Myers on Proposition 13 &#171; Sustainable Cities and Transport</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/proposition-13-demographics-and-housing-the-new-reality-after-the-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-11536</link>
		<dc:creator>Dowell Myers on Proposition 13 &#171; Sustainable Cities and Transport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.com/?p=416#comment-11536</guid>
		<description>[...] Proposition 13. Randy Crane&#8217;s Urban Planning Research Blog* presents a summary of the report here. The full report can be found at his Population Dynamics Research Group [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Proposition 13. Randy Crane&#8217;s Urban Planning Research Blog* presents a summary of the report here. The full report can be found at his Population Dynamics Research Group [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
