<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>urban planning research &#187; community development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://planning-research.com/tag/community-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://planning-research.com</link>
	<description>essays on urban studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>People or Place: Revisiting the Who versus the Where of Urban Development*</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/people-or-place-revisiting-the-who-versus-the-where-of-urban-development/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/people-or-place-revisiting-the-who-versus-the-where-of-urban-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the longest standing debates in community economic development is the face-off between “place-based” and “people-based” approaches to combating poverty, housing affordability, chronic unemployment, and community decline. Should help go to distressed places or distressed people?

The question is not an easy one to answer. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/people-or-place-revisiting-the-who-versus-the-where-of-urban-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Place-Based vs Person-Based Community Development Policies</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/place-based-vs-person-based-community-development-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/place-based-vs-person-based-community-development-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planning debates over the relative merits and consequences of place-based (e.g., policing, enterprise zones, business improvement districts, neighborhood investment strategies, infrastructure, the gamut of supply-side urban development strategies, downtown redevelopment) versus people-based (e.g., training/education, some housing assistance programs, welfare as we knew it, means-tested transfers generally) are omnipresent, yet so far as I can tell [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/place-based-vs-person-based-community-development-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manville on Downtown Revitalization: What, How and Why?</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/manville-on-downtown-revitalization-what-how-and-why/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/manville-on-downtown-revitalization-what-how-and-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtowns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been thinking a bit recently about downtown Los Angeles, which led in turn to my thinking about downtowns in general. Downtown revitalization is one of the oldest policy projects in urban planning and calls to rescue the downtown, or assertions that a city is nothing without a 24-hour downtown, are common in conversations about cities. So too is the idea that downtown is having a comeback. The American downtown, at long last, seems to be growing again. Fueled by loft conversions, the Los Angeles downtown is growing as well (which has led to a curious boom in stores devoted to dog-pampering).

Aside from dogs and their needs, what should planning researchers ask about when they ask about downtown? I can think of three broad questions. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/manville-on-downtown-revitalization-what-how-and-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medieval Inner-City Redevelopment</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/medieval-inner-city-redevelopment/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/medieval-inner-city-redevelopment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Field trip to not-sprawl I am in Cairo with 20 Masters and PhD planning students, toward no real end beyond learning what we can in the time we have about current prospects for the physical city as well as elements of its anti-poverty and pro-environment programs. As a metropolitan area of 15 million plus, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/medieval-inner-city-redevelopment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
