<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>urban planning research &#187; sprawl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://planning-research.com/tag/sprawl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://planning-research.com</link>
	<description>essays on urban studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>On Bruegmann on Sprawl, Smart Growth &amp; Accessibility</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/on-bruegmann-on-sprawl-smart-growth-accessibility/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/on-bruegmann-on-sprawl-smart-growth-accessibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is little doubt that Robert Bruegmann's Sprawl: A Compact History (2005), did transportation and urban development researchers a great service. He situated contemporary discussions of “sprawl,” its problems and many policy responses in well-researched historical context – and he analyzed those responses and that context in substantive, purposeful detail. That he managed to carry this off in a bold, engaging and successfully marketed manner only leaves one all the more envious of the overall package.

A real consequence is that it is now more difficult to argue that sprawl is new, peculiarly American, or universally bad, however one might measure sprawl, new, American, or bad. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/on-bruegmann-on-sprawl-smart-growth-accessibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Co$t$ of $prawl?</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/cot-of-prawl/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/cot-of-prawl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban growth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is sprawl costly and smart growth cheaper? That would depend on what you mean by sprawl, smart growth, and costly. If sprawl is defined as low density or fragmented development, smart growth is the opposite of sprawl, and costly is average per-capita public expenditures aggregated to the county level, then Carruthers and Ulfarsson report absolutely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/cot-of-prawl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprawl and the American Dream: Reviews of Suburban Nation, How Cities Work, and Picture Windows (2002)</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/sprawl-and-the-american-dream-reviews-of-suburban-nation-how-cities-work-and-picture-windows-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/sprawl-and-the-american-dream-reviews-of-suburban-nation-how-cities-work-and-picture-windows-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(More recycled material, to make amends for lack of recent new blog content &#8212; although I do aspire to, at some point, Beckett-like celebrity for a sparse, austere approach to content. These reviews were originally published in JAPA, 2002. Though uncredited due to that journal&#8217;s policy, my pal Lisa Schweitzer coauthored the first draft. P.S. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/sprawl-and-the-american-dream-reviews-of-suburban-nation-how-cities-work-and-picture-windows-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprawl, I Hardly Know Ye</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/sprawl-i-hardly-know-ye/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/sprawl-i-hardly-know-ye/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am behind with other things so to fill space &#38; time I&#8217;m recycling my 1997 letter to the editors of JAPA, commenting on the now famous point/counterpoint articles on sprawl by Gordon &#38; Richardson and Ewing in the previous issue. It is kind of hard to find otherwise (if anyone was looking). This letter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/sprawl-i-hardly-know-ye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suburbanization and Its Discontents</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/suburbanization-and-its-discontents/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/suburbanization-and-its-discontents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planners as therapists/entrepreneurs/office managers, or Random highlights from Harvard Design Magazine About 10 years ago, I gave a presentation with the title of this post for a conference on sprawl. There was talk of the conference proceedings becoming a book, so there was a plan to turn the talk into a chapter. Neither materialized. This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/suburbanization-and-its-discontents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Meaning and Measure of Sprawl</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/the-meaning-and-measure-of-sprawl/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/the-meaning-and-measure-of-sprawl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planners do not like sprawl one little bit and who can blame them? I once heard urban designer Doug Kelbaugh sneeringly describe sprawl as &#8220;a smear on the landscape.&#8221; Who likes a smear? Definitions Let&#8217;s concede that the discussion of what sprawl is and is not covers an awful lot of ground, even if we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/the-meaning-and-measure-of-sprawl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fat City?</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/fat-city/</link>
		<comments>http://planning-research.com/fat-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randall Crane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[: all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does sprawl make one fat? It appears that suburban residents are heavier on average, all things considered. That leaves the question of causality, which can be asked at least two ways. Do heavier people tend to move to the suburbs, or does sprawl makes you/me gain weight? In statistical language, as recently put by Matt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planning-research.com/fat-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

