<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Challenges to Integrating Land Use and Transportation &#8212; in China or Wherever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://planning-research.com/top-5-challenges-to-integrating-land-use-and-transportation-in-china-or-wherever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://planning-research.com/top-5-challenges-to-integrating-land-use-and-transportation-in-china-or-wherever/</link>
	<description>essays on urban studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:41:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://planning-research.com/top-5-challenges-to-integrating-land-use-and-transportation-in-china-or-wherever/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planning-research.martacrane.com/?p=70#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Randy,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;     Excellent overview, but I think there is an element missing from the discussion.  From your description, China is in the middle of a deliberate urbanizing growth strategy.  In the United States, we have several urban regions which either are close to, or already have, reached build out.&lt;br/&gt;     Build out changes the nature of planning questions from &quot;What is the most efficient and/or fair way to grow?&quot; to &quot;How do we maintain a viable system which is conducive to the public health, safety and welfare?&quot;   Shifting the question also shifts the nature of the quantitative tools and methods necessary to get a useful answer.&lt;br/&gt;     From what you describe, the Chinese don&#039;t see themselves as anywhere near finished.  So, this raises the following question:  Leaving aside the issue of cultural differences, how much of the contemporary American context applies to China?&lt;br/&gt;     I would be very interested to hear from you or anyone else reading this blog.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Mike Greenwald - UW Milwaukee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy,</p>
<p>     Excellent overview, but I think there is an element missing from the discussion.  From your description, China is in the middle of a deliberate urbanizing growth strategy.  In the United States, we have several urban regions which either are close to, or already have, reached build out.<br />     Build out changes the nature of planning questions from &#8220;What is the most efficient and/or fair way to grow?&#8221; to &#8220;How do we maintain a viable system which is conducive to the public health, safety and welfare?&#8221;   Shifting the question also shifts the nature of the quantitative tools and methods necessary to get a useful answer.<br />     From what you describe, the Chinese don&#8217;t see themselves as anywhere near finished.  So, this raises the following question:  Leaving aside the issue of cultural differences, how much of the contemporary American context applies to China?<br />     I would be very interested to hear from you or anyone else reading this blog.</p>
<p>Mike Greenwald &#8211; UW Milwaukee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
